Evaluation of Environmental Policy Opportunties (2023)

Paper Type: Free EssaySubject: Environmental Studies
Wordcount: 2239 wordsPublished: 18th May 2020

Reference this

Share this:

FacebookFacebook logoTwitterTwitter logoRedditReddit logoLinkedInLinkedIn logoWhatsAppWhatsApp logo


Discussing environmental policy is a hard subject because of the intricate nature and varied dynamics at work. It is a facet of the legal landscape that cannot be viewed through strictly objective lenses. This at first seems quite controversial due to the fact that politics, regulations, and laws in the grand scope should not be viewed with anything but honest objectivism. This includes keeping in mind the wellbeing of those who will be under mandate of the potential policies and ensuring that they are fair and do not favor sides. This however, cannot always be the case for environmental policies because there are groups who are trying to influence these policies based on their own set of ethics, morals, and reasoning. The reasons why there are so many conflicting sides is that there is no sure method yet on how to preserve the environment and restore harmed ecosystems without harming the economy and developing society. The main questions that have been and are being discussed in present day politics are as follows. How can the reduction of carbon emissions be reduced through economically-informed policy implementation? There is also the aspect of resource extraction which ties in closely with questioning how mining rights and procedures can be changed and innovated. Lastly, how can ecosystem protection and restoration, which heavily focuses on wetland restoration, include policy on water security?

Get Help With Your Essay

(Video) Environmental Policy

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Essay Writing Service

Being able to cut carbon emissions is a key component in the prevention of global climate change that would be detrimental to humanity and the environment. Carbon emissions reductions is such a crucial aspect of environmental policy that needs to be addressed urgently because it is one of the most impactful reasons to why climate change is occurring. Civilization and societal growth has been the primary factor for carbon emissions rapidly increasing in the atmosphere. Without proper and deliberate action taken on carbon emissions, every other aspect of environmental policies and regulations will be significantly more difficult to obtain. One of the most controversial but seemingly hopeful proposals to combat the quantities of greenhouse gases being pumped into the atmosphere is the implementation of a carbon tax policy. A cap and trade system, such as the one that is currently being worked on in the EU would create an incentive for environmentally friendly businesses to maintain sustainable practices while being able create a better profit margin. This measure will provide incentive for improving energy efficiency (Obama 2017).

Although realistically speaking, a temporary decrease in capital and revenue is likely yet, there is more that we can be doing on the individual and household level in order to create a change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. There is a lot of data available that shows how there is a strong correlation between the rise of greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere with the rise of large-scale agriculture, urban centers, and industrialism (Dietz 2009). There have been many studies, such as Diez’s in which he discusses carbon tax and tax incentive programs for those who switch to alternative energy sources. That transition can be beneficial because large corporations will begin to make the changes to follow societal shifts. All these policies begin at the grassroots level and with community support and with it the effects of climate change can be mitigated (Diez 2009).

Being able to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through policies is not only for societal and economic change but also on how federal lands are to be utilized and maintained. Since the 1970s when OPEC raised prices on crude oil reserves and threated to boycott the United States due to its support for Israel in the Yom Kippur War; the United States has been under immense pressure to open up federal lands to develop energy sources (Davis 2001). These energy sources included, oil, natural gas, and coal. Being able to create policy that addresses the role that federal lands will play in the long run is crucial, such as placing strict restrictions on mistreatment of lands that are not made available for energy development. These ideas however, have been heavily impacted by interest groups, partisanship, and the bureaucratic routines. In order to create opportunities for environmental policy enactment, the seemingly dichotomous relationship between pro-environmental groups and politicians and the pro-business groups and politicians has to be addressed and a discussion on development and not growth needs is paramount.

Resource extraction is a concept that has been quite intertwined with federal land usage politics since the 1970s and one of the most impactful regulatory policies was the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. As mining technologies have continued to improve and the methods of extracting minerals and natural resources have increased there must also be newly developed environmental oversight. There needs to be updated laws which focus heavily on the preservation of the environment surrounding mining operations, fiscal reform in order to hold companies monetarily accountable, and most importantly the reclamation and restoration of the territories after the mines have been shut down. Even though there have been policies such as SMCRA put in place to regulate environmental effects of resource extraction and reclamation, there have been countless negative environmental and societal impacts due to negligence and difficulties with oversight.

The U.S. General Mining Law of 1872 is a vastly outdated law that is still in use and has created a series of political challenges involving the balance between business growth versus environmental protection. According to the 1872 Mining Law individuals and private firms can purchase mineral bearing lands for $2.50 or $5.00 making the transition from public to private ownership extremely simple (Davis 2001). There are also no fees or royalties that are required to be paid through the extraction of minerals from public lands in the United States. It does not matter how many minerals and metals are taken from the lands, the U.S. government does not see any income from it. This has led many foreign mining companies and corporations to enter the United States and extract the land of its natural resources without compensating the U.S. and without holding themselves accountable for the destruction of the environment (Lachelt 2018). The methods that are used to extract the minerals have many negative effects on the environment and on human health. Some of what is affected include water resources, air quality, wildlife, and local vegetation.

Situations like this and many more are the real consequences of the General Mining Law of 1872. It allows these corporations to take public safety for granted. This includes leaving waste piles such as tailings and acid mine drainage which can pollute local water resources and toxic dust and ore processing chemicals which can contaminate the air quality (Davis 2001). If new laws and regulations are not implemented soon then environmental degradation will continue to occur on a massive scale in the United States. There need to be clear policies set in place that ensure the lands that are used for mining will be able to be used for other endeavors in the future. Whether it consists of returning the land to local farmers or returning the protection status to a wildlife reserve the lands need to at least be restored to their original state.

Find Out How UKEssays.com Can Help You!

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

View our services

(Video) Environmental Policy Govt of India (Critical Evaluation)

The restoration of natural lands to their original state is a challenge that has also been fought hard in politics since the 1970s within the House Interior/Resources Committee. The protection of Forest Service lands has been under heavy conflict because of the constant discussions on how to properly balance the conflicting uses of those land. The reason it is under so much controversy is because it deals with having to balance the needs of the environment while still maintaining the local communities economically stable. There is pressure from both sides, the economic urban side and the national ecological interests to create policies, regulations, and laws that benefit one side (Davis 2001). Where this issue becomes the most complicated is when it deals with wetlands and specifically wetland restoration areas. There can be wetlands of all shapes and sizes and found at the basin of large geological features such as mountains and hills, and therefore, even though some wetlands are relatively small in comparison, all of the surface water and additional runoff from high elevations precipitate and can collect in these watersheds.

These lands are extremely important to preserve because it provides that additional natural flood control as well as providing a safe haven for a wide variety of plants and animals. The challenges in developing policy that specifically focus on ecosystem restoration involves creating strong partnerships with landowners, environmental organizations, business firms, and the federal government in the surrounding areas help to protect and maintain the extended network of reserved lands. This, in turn, helps to keep the wetland’s hydrology, flora, and fauna intact. Only through all of these parties working in collaboration will we be able to protect the wildlife within the boundaries of the ecosystems and wetlands and be able to send a powerful message about conservation. Conservation and restoration also includes the application of scientific data to inform the proper implementation of policies and regulations.

For example, Studying the particular dynamics of sediment transport is important for the monitoring and safety of communities that surround bodies of water. During rainy seasons, an accumulation of sediment could lead to flooding that could endanger the lives of many. Depending on the location, mudslides could also be triggered that could affect the safety and prosperity of a community (Walling 2009). It is important the impacts in order to help sustain a healthy natural environment for all the creatures that live in those habitats as well increase awareness on how to use those natural resources, such as water, in a way that does not have a negative effect ecologically, socially, or economically. Inspiration for future policies that involve the protection and restoration of natural lands can be drawn from The National Wildlife Refuge Administration Act of 1966 and the amendment by the Refuge Improvement Act of 1997 (Davis 2001). These acts help to find common ground between environmentalists and local communities who benefit economically from the tourism and recreational uses of the land including hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, environmental education, and interpretation. Furthering bipartisan policies such as these which open up dialogue for both sides is paramount to future policies.

At the end of the day, these main challenges for environmental policy: the reduction of carbon emissions, the extraction of resources, and the protection and restoration of ecosystems are also the greatest opportunities to further the influence of this political field. It is about understanding the complex relationships between citizens, interest groups, businesses, and the government. Most importantly, it is about understanding that citizens have the right and ability to carry out the vision that they have for the future of the nation. It is up to the interest groups and the government to keep citizens well informed and be ambitious about implementing policies and regulations that are for the development of a sustainable and fair society. Lastly, it is up to businesses to understand there is a place of balance where economy and ecology can work hand in hand. These political challenges will not go anywhere, however, if all of these groups are willing to work as one united entity, then that sustainable and fair society is not in the distant future.


(Video) Environmental Policy Explained

  • Davis, C. E. (2001).Western Public Lands and Environmental Politics (2nd ed.) [Second Edition]. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/osu/reader.action?docID=1076649&ppg=155.
  • Dietz, T., & Et. al. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,106(44), 18452-18456. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908738106
  • Lachelt, G. (2018). Congress’s mining rider would put us in the hole. Retrieved from https://www.denverpost.com/2019/03/14/congresss-mining-rider-would- put-us-in-the-hole/
  • Obama, B. (2017). The irreversible momentum of clean energy.Science,355(6321), 126-129. doi:10.1126/science.aam6284
  • Walling, D.E (2009) The Impact of Global Change on Erosion and Sediment Transport by Rivers: Current Progress and Future Challenges

Share this:

FacebookFacebook logoTwitterTwitter logoRedditReddit logoLinkedInLinkedIn logoWhatsAppWhatsApp logo

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

  • APA
  • MLA
  • MLA-7
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Wikipedia

Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.

(Video) Evaluation and Implementation of EU Environmental Policy

Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all
Essay Writing ServiceFrom £124
Dissertation Writing ServiceFrom £124
Assignment Writing ServiceFrom £124

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please:

(Video) Scenario 3: Policy Evaluation


What is environmental policy evaluation? ›

In this area we analyse the effectiveness and impacts of current and future climate and energy policies. Robust and coherent policies are vital to tackling climate change.

What is the main function of environmental policy answer? ›

The main function of environmental policy is to, through government action, minimize the environmental impact of businesses and society.

What are the five criteria for evaluating? ›

Common evaluation criteria include: purpose and intended audience, authority and credibility, accuracy and reliability, currency and timeliness, and objectivity or bias. Each of these criteria will be explained in more detail below.

What are the three main types of policy evaluations? ›

The three main types of evaluation, shown in the bottom row of Figure 3, each focus on a different phase of the policy process5: policy content evaluation, policy implementation evaluation, and policy impact evaluation.

What is the main objective of policy evaluation? ›

Policy evaluation is conducted for checking the effects of the policies of respective ministries and for evaluating the policies in terms of necessity, efficiency, validity, etc. to improve the planning and implementation process.

What are the two main purposes of environmental policy? ›

Environmental policy is aimed at balancing environmental protection and the conservation of natural resources with other policy goals, such as affordable energy as well as economic growth and employment.

What is an environmental policy give one example? ›

Minimising your impact on the environment and cutting pollution and waste – by using energy efficiency measures, e.g. switching off lights, reducing the use of water. You could also consider minimising waste and reducing the environmental impact of your business generally, e.g. buying locally to cut fuel costs.

What are three examples of policies affecting the environment? ›

In the 1970s, the United States government enacted three major environmental laws: the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act. Elected representatives passed this environmental legislation to increase regulations regarding air, water, and toxic substances.

What is the basic objective of environmental policy? ›

It provides for the protection, conservation, rehabilitation and improvement of the environment, for the prevention and control of pollution, and promotion of sustainable development.

How can you evaluate the effectiveness of a policy? ›

The gold standard to evaluate and quantify the effectiveness of policies is the comparison of empirical observations with a control group in an experimental design or with a counterfactual scenario.

What makes an effective policy evaluation? ›

Policy evaluation can only be truly effective if it is of high quality and its results are used. Quality control and quality assurance are key to ensuring the robustness of evaluations. Standards play an important role in quality assurance, and guidelines exist in three-quarters of the countries surveyed.

What are the two main types of policy evaluation? ›

There are two main types of policy evaluation – summative and formative evaluation. Summative Evaluation - (often referred to as impact evaluation) looks at the impact a policy, programme or other form of policy intervention has on specific outcomes for different groups.

What are the three main purposes of evaluation? ›

This article discusses the relationships between the three main goals of evaluation (to learn, measure and understand) and the various types of evidence (evidence of presence, of difference-making, of mechanism) which are produced and/or used in the evaluation process.

What are the two 2 basic types of evaluation? ›

The two types of evaluation described below – formative and summative – are not mutually exclusive. Many evaluations contain a bit of both. But one purpose is usually more dominant. A formative evaluation is normally carried out during a project or programme, often at the mid-point.

What is the big question we ask when evaluating a policy? ›

What is the "big question" we ask when evaluating policy? Was there a significant and positive impact to the target group(s) that would have not otherwise occurred without the policy or program.

What are the most common evaluation methods? ›

The three main types of evaluation methods are goal-based, process-based and outcomes-based.

What are the methods used in policy analysis and evaluation? ›

There are five basic approaches to policy analysis: formal cost-benefit analysis, qualitative cost-benefit analysis, modified cost-benefit analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis and the most common type of policy analysis, multi-goal policy analysis.

Why is it important to evaluate how the policy is working? ›

This is why policy evaluation design is important. It allows leaders to create the policy, based on known information, and then develop a theory. As that theory evolves into an implemented practice, leaders are able to see what practical and real-life issues arise.

Why is evaluation the most important stage of policy development? ›

Evaluation is an essential part of the policy cycle, as it facilitates evidence-based policy design and implementation, increasing the policy's accountability and transparency, demonstrating achievements towards policy objectives and assessing the policies effectiveness, efficiency, results and impacts.

What is an evaluation plan for a policy? ›

An evaluation plan is a written document that describes how you will monitor and evaluate your program, as well as how you intend to use evaluation results for program improvement and decision making. The evaluation plan clarifies how you will describe the “What,” the “How,” and the “Why It Matters” for your program.

Why is it important to have an environmental policy? ›

Environmental law works to protect land, air, water, and soil. Negligence of these laws results in various punishments like fines, community service, and in some extreme cases, jail time. Without these environmental laws, the government would not be able to punish those who treat the environment poorly.

What are the benefits of having an environmental policy? ›

Advantages of an environmental policy

improving cost control. reducing incidents that result in liability. conserving raw materials and energy. improving your monitoring of environmental impacts.

What is the most important consideration for environmental policy makers? ›

Answer and Explanation: The most important consideration for environmental policy-makers is environmental health.

What are the criteria of policy evaluation? ›


Kraft and Furlong (2010, pp. 151–161) discuss eight criteria for evaluating public policy proposals: effectiveness, efficiency, equity, liberty/freedom, political feasibility, social acceptability, adminis- trative feasibility, and technical feasibility.

What are the six 6 criteria in evaluating sources? ›

There are six (6) criteria that should be applied when evaluating any Web site: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, coverage, and appearance. For each criterion, there are several questions to be asked.

What are the 3 categories of environmental valuation methods? ›

Valuation methods include both demand and non-demand curve approaches, including the dose-response method, contingent valuation method, and hedonic pricing.


1. Environmental impact assessments: identifying relevant issues and concerns from the beginning
(Inter-American Development Bank)
2. 44 10 1 Environmental Policy Assessment Standards
3. Careers in Environmental Policy Panel (April 2020)
(Daniel J. Evans School of Public Policy and Governance)
4. Environmental Policy and Management: David Eaton
(The LBJ School)
5. 9.4: International Environmental Policies
(Dan Snyder)
6. Lessons learnt from the EEA catalogue of environment and climate policy evaluations in Europe
(Leonardo ENERGY)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Annamae Dooley

Last Updated: 03/18/2023

Views: 5771

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (45 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Annamae Dooley

Birthday: 2001-07-26

Address: 9687 Tambra Meadow, Bradleyhaven, TN 53219

Phone: +9316045904039

Job: Future Coordinator

Hobby: Archery, Couponing, Poi, Kite flying, Knitting, Rappelling, Baseball

Introduction: My name is Annamae Dooley, I am a witty, quaint, lovely, clever, rich, sparkling, powerful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.